Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: FlyVet

"Are they going to fire people who drink too much? Are overweight? Eat too much junk food? Race motorcycles on the weekend?"

Yes, this has all either happened or will happen in the Orwellian world that has arrived.

And those freepers defending this policy...you will be next....hmmmm....fired for being a republican....hey its the right of the business to do that...isn't it?


30 posted on 12/23/2005 7:30:49 AM PST by fizziwig
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]


To: fizziwig

Yes, it is Orwellian. Up is down, right is wrong, black is white.


38 posted on 12/23/2005 7:38:49 AM PST by khnyny (Merry Christmas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]

To: fizziwig

Wait until they do genetic testing. Got a predisposition for heart disease? Cancer? Mental illness? Good luck getting a job, or at least a job with any health benefits. Off to the shower rooms with you!


43 posted on 12/23/2005 7:46:14 AM PST by FlyVet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]

To: fizziwig
Yes, this has all either happened or will happen in the Orwellian world that has arrived.

Inappropriate label and comparison. Orwell's 1984 had to do with government. This is a private employer that wishes to set certain criteria on who will be hired vs who will not be hired, absent government interference. Any true conservative should support any employer who choses not to employ smokers.

50 posted on 12/23/2005 7:53:42 AM PST by xrp (Conservative votes are to Republicans what 90% of black votes are to Democrats (taken for granted))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]

To: fizziwig

My first reaction was that this was outrageous.

Then as I read through the comments, I realized that my reaction was wrong if you believe in freedom. Maybe they handled it badly because it wasn't clear they didn't hire smokers, but shouldn't the employer have the right to hire only those he wants to hire -- for any reason, no matter how ridiculous or how discriminatory others might perceive that decision?

Whose job is it anyway? The worker's or the employer's?


51 posted on 12/23/2005 7:54:32 AM PST by Badray (Limited constitutional government means protection for all, but favor for none.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson