Haha! Sure, it is.
As I understand it, ID is merely a field of inquiry. I don't understand why the Darwinists are so adamant that it not be permitted.
Remember when adults said to their kids you cannot have some item. I believe the judge has increased the curiosity of the "forbidden intelligent design" so that many will look into it.
Naturalists want something bigger out of the equation and because they have not developed an instrument that can see the invisible they dismiss its existence and yet we know animals can hear beyond range. What's not to say there is life are human eyes cannot see.
Naturalism says we have laws by chance and yet there is no earthly reason why we should be able to communicate over the internet by naturalism. Look at the range of temperature for human existence 98.6. Think about it. Get down to 90 or go to 102, and you start to have problems. Same with the earth temperature. Go to -100 For 200 F and life becomes impossible. Look at the other planets, and we find they are not fit for human life.
Naturalists say that man is the greatest being out there and yet one looks at Mt Everest and realizes we are very small. We see the power of tornadoes, hurricanes, earthquakes and tsunamis and see nature is more powerful than man. We build our computers and planes but have yet to fully replicate the human brain.
The argument goes forces of nature eventually brought about man and man builds a spaceship. Non-living force produces intelligent life and then intelligent life makes technological marvels. I choose to believe Intelligent Life brought about intelligent man who makes technological marvels.