Liberalism is a cancer on society. Creationism is a cancer on conservatism.
What a conundrum...A Darwinist inferring that cancer is a bad thing. One would think that cancer fits nicely into evolution. To a Darwinist, that would be a good thing, no?
Accountability is, in the end, what the whole debate boils down to. The thought of being held accountable for your actions does not fit well with the naturalist's mindset.
This is also a conundrum for one that wishes to be affiliated with conservatism...being accountable for your actions is one of its chief precepts.
I suggest you pick a side, and stop straddling the fence. Unless, of course, you are not 100% sure of your convictions. If that is the case, at least state your position as such. Committed naturalists can't have it both ways (unless the courts should happen to intervene on your behalf and declare, by judicial fiat, that I can no longer question your posts.)
Good day.
One would be thinking in very strawman terms. Cancers cells are the suicide bombers of cellular activity, killing their host and dooming themselves.
As for the tagline, I was contemplating a change to "There is no attempt in ID to learn the unknown. Rather, it is an exercise in unlearning the known." However, since this one is still getting attention, it can stay for a while.