Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: AFA-Michigan

The church and state arguments were based on the situation in England at the time of the Federal convention. The state had created its own church and the church had seats in Parliament. There should not be that kind of tie between church and state, but the separation need not be a wall of infinite thickness and height.


11 posted on 12/21/2005 1:19:44 PM PST by RightWhale (pas de lieu, Rhone que nous)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: RightWhale

Actually, if you read relative papers, including the letter to the Danbury Baptists by Thomas Jefferson, the "wall" referred to so often in recent years only meant that Congress could not regulate individual states' religious affairs. Individual states, according to writings at the time, were free to conduct their own religious affairs including establishing State churches.


168 posted on 12/23/2005 6:40:29 AM PST by Spacetrucker (The truth always hurts more...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

To: RightWhale
Whale wrote:

The church and state arguments were based on the situation in England at the time of the Federal convention.

James Madison writes:

Read my Memorial and Remonstrance if you what to know what the arguments were for no government authority over religion.
258 posted on 01/16/2006 12:33:10 PM PST by FredFlash
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson