I think they shouldn't lie for one thing.
"...Upon an application made pursuant to this section, if the judge finds that the application meets the requirements of subsections (a) and (b), ..."
If the mindless PA haters had any concern for facts they may also mention that
"(f)(1) A person receiving an order to produce any tangible thing under this section may challenge the legality of that order by filing a petition with the pool established by section 103(e)(1). "
They may also mention that
"In April of each year, the Attorney General shall submit to the House and Senate Committees on the Judiciary and the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence and the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence a report setting forth with respect to the preceding calendar year';... `(3) the number of such orders either granted, modified, or denied for the production of each of the following:
`(A) Library circulation records, library patron lists, book sales records, or book customer lists.
`(B) Firearms sales records."
But why provide the sheep with facts?
They don't even have to go that route. They can just use an NSL.
"-- If the mindless PA haters had any concern for facts --"
If the mindless haters ~in favor of~ the PA had any concern for facts --
Could it be that 'mindless hate' just might be the problem? -- And that abiding by the ~facts~ of our Constitution will be the answer?