Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: gondramB
We were at war when the last abuses were done. The public The Democrats and the Media knew this and still wanted the power of domestic spying without warrants taken away from the government and they got laws enacted to that effect.

There, now it's correct. Besides, this was not "domestic spying" it was monitoring the communications of foreign terrorists, and only when they contacted someone in the US was that person's communications targeted, and even then, only their international communications.

It also appears that if the person seemed to be actively involved in planing or supporting terrorist activities, then a warrant was sought to monitor their domestic communications as well. I think the administration bent over backwards to accommodate the law to well beyond the limits of the Constitutionality of that law.

86 posted on 12/21/2005 3:09:34 PM PST by El Gato
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies ]


To: El Gato

"There, now it's correct. Besides, this was not "domestic spying" it was monitoring the communications of foreign terrorists, and only when they contacted someone in the US was that person's communications targeted, and even then, only their international communications."

I hope that turns out to be the case...


87 posted on 12/21/2005 4:02:41 PM PST by gondramB (Rightful liberty is unobstructed action within limits of the equal rights of others.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson