No. And if someone wanted proof of Gods existence, shouldn't it be religious people, not science?
And just because people reject Darwin hardly takes us back to the dark ages.
It's no wonder you don't understand evolution, you didn't even comprehend my post.
On the small possibility you might understand if I explain it again, the problem is the re-definition of "science" to include the acceptance of supernatural causes. Once something is accepted as being caused by the supernatural, it becomes blasphemous to look for a natural cause. See my explanation above, where if the sun was explained as getting it's energy from God, then exploring the nuclear nature of solar energy would be out-of-bounds.
Pushing ID into the field of science is dangerous from many different perspectives.
You have been explaining to all of us for many months now. Thanks just the same. And why don't you think scientists should look for God? Imagine the fame and glory of any scientist that could actually prove God's existence. It would be way better than finding a bunch of old bones!