Then you must just have a problem with the Bible. Either God created humans in their present form (per Genesis) or He didn't.
"Then you must just have a problem with the Bible. Either God created humans in their present form (per Genesis) or He didn't."
Are you a young earth creationist? I mean you either are or are not taking liberties with interpretations.
I think Genesis is correct, but it's what God told wandering goat-herders 5000 years ago --- isn't a science textbook and can't be read as such. Instead its purpose is to tell us of the supremacy of God and of His central importance in our universe.
Genesis 2:7: Then G-d formed man of the dust of the ground, and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life; and man became a living soul.
"Formed," according to various sources I've seen, being related to the work of a potter. A potter does not instantly create. He molds and forms his work over time... Which is a rather good analogy to for evolution.
To the originally Hebrews the Bible was given to -- who spoke the language it was written in as their everyday language -- the Bible would not have spoken of instant creation, but of gradual creation over time.
I have no problems with the Biblical account of creation; I have no problems with evolution.