To: Rodney King
Neither would surprise me a bit, but I have found that federal law gives far too much power to airborne waitresses, when it should really rest only in the hands of the Captain.
9 posted on
12/20/2005 8:44:41 PM PST by
clee1
(We use 43 muscles to frown, 17 to smile, and 2 to pull a trigger. I'm lazy and I'm tired of smiling.)
To: clee1
I have found that federal law gives far too much power to airborne waitresses, It's my understanding that the primary job of the "airborne waitresses" is to ensure the safety and security of the passengers and plane, and that serving goodies is secondary to that task.
15 posted on
12/20/2005 8:51:22 PM PST by
SlowBoat407
(The best stuff happens just before the thread snaps.)
To: clee1
Neither would surprise me a bit, but I have found that federal law gives far too much power to airborne waitresses, when it should really rest only in the hands of the Captain. Of course! Your understanding of delegated authority is positively Blackstonian. Federal law also gives far too much power to Napoleonic junior officers and sailors aboard U.S. Navy ships, usurping authority that should only be wielded by the Captain.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson