Did you guys actually read this article?
The article states that Bush's assertion that intelligence was wrong is not correct. It then cites several examples of WMDs that were found and states that most of it was likely moved to Lebanon and Syria.
This isn't a "troll article"
EASY. I was appropriately questioning the use of the word lie. I am amazed at the amount of news stories are willing to be the source for their own story.
The assertion of the title is a stretch. The bottom line is President Bush does not have The barrels of chemicals the CIA told him he would have. IT is not a lie for him to acknowledge that fact, nor does it change anything. WE can know there were WMD because Saddam used them, however he was not able to kill the thousands of soldiers with chemical weapons as was expected. Do you see headlines declaring how Presidant Bush headfaked Saddam and won? ........