Skip to comments.
Now President Bush is Lying: Why?
NationalLedger.com ^
| Dec 20, 2005
| JB Williams
Posted on 12/20/2005 8:21:20 PM PST by PlainOleAmerican
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 201-218 next last
To: PlainOleAmerican; All
Another case of posters not reading the article at hand and jumping on the IBTZ bandwagon, try reading the article next time.
41
posted on
12/20/2005 8:35:43 PM PST
by
Xenophobic Alien
(Kerry lost. Please take that stupid bumper sticker off your car!)
To: PlainOleAmerican
So you hung around a month to post this?
42
posted on
12/20/2005 8:35:58 PM PST
by
softwarecreator
(Facts are to liberals as holy water is to vampires.)
To: TheForceOfOne
The democrat party reminds me of the juvenile (I mean a three-year-old) who throws self on the floor in a fit if not given his or her desires, tossing out the offered goddies because they don't include every demand of the juvenile. Sadly, throwing cold water on their seditious faces isn't going to help as they destroy this nation simply because they cannot force themselves back into power. [And if anyone doubts the deadly nature of the democrap party, consider the tens-of-millions of alive unborn children the democrap party continues to defend the slaughter of as a means to empower their (democrat) political arses; a political party that cannot summarily condemn partial birth abortion INFANTICIDE is a party without moral compass and dangerous to the nation's survival.]
43
posted on
12/20/2005 8:36:18 PM PST
by
MHGinTN
(If you can read this, you've had life support from someone. Promote life support for others.)
To: PlainOleAmerican
Has anybody read the article? What it says is that there almost certainly WERE WMDs in Iraq, but that after Jay Rockefeller tipped off Syria they were trucked out into the Bekaa Valley.
So was Bush wise to admit that intelligence on WMDs was wrong?
I don't see why this deserves a Zot, other than the silly title.
44
posted on
12/20/2005 8:36:21 PM PST
by
Cicero
(Marcus Tullius)
To: PlainOleAmerican
Read the article folks, not just the lame title! Though, this shouldn't be in breaking either. It might also be a good idea for the moderators to append a message to the thread title, like "(not what you think)".
45
posted on
12/20/2005 8:36:26 PM PST
by
M203M4
To: PAR35
The number of buffoons on this thread who are criticizing the poster as a troll without ever reading the article that he/she posted is truly embarrassing. I think I'll come back later tonight when the children have gone to bed.
To: rockinonritalin; PAR35
OKAY 10 minutes and no reply.
To: M203M4
I think maybe two or three of us actually read the article. lol
To: PlainOleAmerican
Don't worry. Some FReepers are to lazy to read. Thanks for the post.
49
posted on
12/20/2005 8:37:34 PM PST
by
ILS21R
To: Salamander
Spyware Doctor. Is the problem the site or my software? It seems awfully touchy to me but considering the amount of crap I find on my system, I am a touch paranoid these days
50
posted on
12/20/2005 8:37:43 PM PST
by
MNJohnnie
(We do not create terrorism by fighting the terrorists. We invite terrorism by ignoring them.--GWBush)
To: Lancey Howard
We get all the news we need from the morning headlines.
51
posted on
12/20/2005 8:37:56 PM PST
by
Luis Gonzalez
(Some people see the world as they would want it to be, effective people see the world as it is.)
To: PlainOleAmerican
JB Williams is a business man...He has a degree in BS...
Poor form to forget full disclosure, n00b. You want to drive traffic to NL, disclose what you're up to, up front. Otherwise, pound sand.
To: M203M4
It was good.
I have no idea why W does anything.
Then again, I'm not a very good poker player, either...:)
53
posted on
12/20/2005 8:38:24 PM PST
by
Salamander
(Cursed With Second Sight)
To: CedarDave
The article looked good to me too.
54
posted on
12/20/2005 8:38:29 PM PST
by
faq
(http://www.reasons-for-war-with-iraq.info/)
To: eyespysomething
You're asking all the questions but not giving any answers. What's your take on this?
55
posted on
12/20/2005 8:38:33 PM PST
by
SittinYonder
(That's how I saw it, and see it still.)
To: MNJohnnie
I am protected by all sorts of firewalls and spyware programs, and I didn't have any problems at all at that site.
56
posted on
12/20/2005 8:38:43 PM PST
by
Cicero
(Marcus Tullius)
To: PlainOleAmerican
Good article, actually. Warn us next time, please :)
57
posted on
12/20/2005 8:39:30 PM PST
by
sageb1
(This is the Final Crusade. There are only 2 sides. Pick one.)
To: Lancey Howard
Syria has recently offered to hide Iran's nukes for them if it becomes necessary.
But of course they wouldn't have made the same offer to Saddam.
58
posted on
12/20/2005 8:40:17 PM PST
by
Mogollon
To: MNJohnnie
"Is the problem the site or my software?"
It's the site: Pop-Up Stopper went ape while the site came up. Possibly hotlinked here for just that purpose.
59
posted on
12/20/2005 8:40:21 PM PST
by
decal
(Mother Nature and Real Life are conservatives; the Progs have never figured this out.)
To: Jet Jaguar
New to posting.... Not as fast as you all... What's the question?
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 201-218 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson