The last part is true and the first part is unknowable. I'm not saying he is wrong in giving. I'm just turned off by his announcing of it. Wouldn't God look better on it if it wasn't plastered all over the news as proof of his devotion? Besides, I think you can be a very charitable person and still not a christian or a preacher of the real gospel. So my point is that that is nowhere near enough. He draws people with an appearance of holiness but he preaches what looks to me like a different gospel than the gospel of Jesus. Jesus started out with the call to repentance.
Further..his giving to his own church is sort of like investing the money back in his own business. He benefits.
So first you condemn him for being wealthy, then when you find out he's given most of his money away, you condemn him for letting that fact be known. Kind of sticking him in a no-win situation, aren't you?