You like this decision because you agree with the premise (ID is not science). However, do you believe judges should be deciding what is and isn't science??
susie
The scientific community has quite clearly determined that ID is not science. The judge merely determines whether it's permissible to teach religion as if it's science.
No I dont believe judges should be asked to waste their time on cases like this. But then I dont think school districts should waste the time of their students by teaching non-science in science class. Now I have no problem with them mentioning that one sentence or discussing the biblical story of creation as part of world history but not science.