Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: betty boop
If humanism were right in declaring that man is born to be happy, he would not be born to die. Since his body is doomed to die, his task on earth evidently must be of a more spiritual nature. It cannot unrestrained enjoyment of everyday life. It cannot be the search for the best ways to obtain material goods and then cheerfully get the most out of them. It has to be the fulfillment of a permanent, earnest duty so that one's life journey may become an experience of moral growth, so that one may leave life a better human being than one started it. It is imperative to review the table of widespread human values. Its present incorrectness is astounding. It is not possible that assessment of the President's performance be reduced to the question of how much money one makes or of unlimited availability of gasoline. Only voluntary, inspired self-restraint can raise man above the world stream of materialism.

This, above all else. And this is precisely what the Machiavellian, Gramscian Left has worked so hard to strip from our culture and from our inner selves.

And is it not those same Marxist materialists who deem us no better, and in many cases, less than than things, animals or machines? And was it not O'Brien who promised Winston that their aim was to hollow out human beings and fill them with themselves?

We have now gone sufficiently far enough down the road to totalitarianism that there is only one way to stop them. Only one way.

10 posted on 06/07/2013 10:20:52 AM PDT by Noumenon (What would Michael Collins do?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]


To: Noumenon; cornelis; Alamo-Girl; marron; spirited irish; thouworm
And is it not those same Marxist materialists who deem us no better, and in many cases, less than than things, animals or machines? And was it not O'Brien who promised Winston that their aim was to hollow out human beings and fill them with themselves?

Well, what can I say, dear Noumenon? If one "kills God," Man is always the real victim.

God knows the difference between a man and a machine. O'Brien does not.

And Winston is confused by this discrepancy. Do you suppose Winston is an agnostic?

Definition of agnostic, Oxford Dictionary:

noun
a person who believes that nothing is known or can be known of the existence or nature of God or of anything beyond material phenomena; a person who claims neither faith nor disbelief in God.

But where, in material phenomena, does the agnostic locate the origin of Truth about the universe and our human place in it?

Just wondering....

I surely hope you are wrong about the "only way" to stop the totalitarian aggression against the American people as clearly perpetrated by the Obama Regime.

But if you aren't, you had better have God on your side....

Or so it seems to me, FWIW.

11 posted on 06/07/2013 2:45:09 PM PDT by betty boop (We are led to believe a lie when we see with, and not through the eye. — William Blake)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson