In any case, giving you the benefit of the doubt this one time:
(1) I have said time and again on this thread that I do not want the 2nd Amendment threatened, so bury that shibboleth.
(2) Of course I know we can call any senator. However, I think it's pointless because the staff only records constituent calls. Besides, I have nothing I want to convey to Craig. He did what he did. If he did it for legitimate reasons of principle, fine. If not, time will tell.
(3) I am "swerving" past no points. From the AP: "Without some sort of compromise, the 16 provisions expire Dec. 31." That essentially guts the Patriot Act, effectively killing it. At least that is my understanding of the situation. If you understand it differently and wish to explain where I'm wrong -- and if you can do so calmly and respectfully -- I will listen.
(4) Lastly, you wrote: "You do not seem to be able to comprehend ONE SENTENCE of his statement." What part of the following, which I wrote in my prior post, did you not understand?
The one thing I did hear that resonated with me was his statement about living in Idaho when the Ruby Ridge family was destroyed. I agree with Craig that such abuses as Ruby Ridge and Waco must be prevented from happening again.
Apparently, you only pay attention to the subject when start the insult game and suffer the same. Now, we are on the same SIDE. Glad you woke up.
As for my style... you either love me or you don't. Because I am looking out for us all.. I am NOT a party hack. Thank you for your kind attention... :)