Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: rattrap

I normally quit reading nonsense once I recognize it as such. In my case this article was burdened by false analogies, historical distortions of fact, and illogic in the first two minutes. If the premises are faulty, why listen for a conclusion?


29 posted on 12/20/2005 7:45:41 AM PST by OrangeBlossomSpecial (DEAN, KERRY & HERPES : The gifts that keep on giving & giving & giving)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]


To: OrangeBlossomSpecial
Because when you don't read the whole thing, then start spouting off comments you run a real risk of looking like a fool. I knew by the time I was through the first sentence there were going to be a ton of comments posted just minutes after a fairly long article that were "opening their mouth and removing all doubt" as Twain would say.

Read First, Then Post. There is no prize for first comment.
31 posted on 12/20/2005 7:56:55 AM PST by rattrap
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson