To: sportutegrl
Pretty bad language from a former law school dean. Still, I'm wondering here... if this was after the trial, what business has the judge calling the attorney on the carpet for calling jurors "crackers?"
To: MajorityOfOne
It is unprofessional conduct for a member of the bar (a lawyer) to act like a racist against jurors because he is angry that they did not let his client act like racists. Would you be asking the same question if it was a kkk trial?
19 posted on
12/20/2005 7:07:39 AM PST by
Galveston Grl
(Getting angry and abandoning power to the Democrats is not a choice.)
To: MajorityOfOne
He is an Officer of the Court and this matter, even though it was outside the trial, was directly related to his position as an officer of the court.
22 posted on
12/20/2005 10:27:11 AM PST by
GreenLanternCorps
(11-3 AFC North Champs!!! Who Dey! Who Dey! Who Dey Think Gonna Beat Dem Bengals!!!)
To: MajorityOfOne
I also believe in freedom of speech, and think the judge should not have made it an issue. But since it is out there, we can see how hypocricital these race baiters are. We have a lawyer trying to prove that the local government does not discriminate against whites, but he himself calls them crackers. It is so deliciously ironic.
24 posted on
12/21/2005 5:25:51 AM PST by
sportutegrl
(People who say, "All I know is . . ." really mean, "All I want you to focus on is . . .")
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson