Nope, it's a business. Not a private home, stable, or outhouse, where such activites should be taking place. Plus the fact that the owners of this crap are partners with or hiring someone who tours the country supporting their practice of setting up shop in small towns. Going against the town laws, and then suing, so the small town can't afford to fight them.
If they want it private, keep it in someone's house, stable, or outhouse, where it belongs.
"outhouse"
You just described MrMeans bizarre narcissis mind.
And business owners don't have rights? And the swingers don't have a First Amendment right of free association? Could the town pass an ordinance outlawing sex in a hotel...which is also a business?
Plus the fact that the owners of this crap are partners with or hiring someone who tours the country supporting their practice of setting up shop in small towns.
So its evil to hire an attorney who is specialized and experienced?
Going against the town laws, and then suing, so the small town can't afford to fight them.
The story says that it was "a new ordinance,"...a new ordinance to stop this particular club? And the article doesn't say anything about the club suing, the club owners just want to be left alone...but if the town wants to shut down a private club, it may have to pay a price.