The Times argues in favor of a paper trail for the controversial Diebold 'Evil' Machines.
I debunk their dishonest op-ed.
There is nothing controversial about Diebold machines at all. They just got hammered during the election and are looking for any moonbat, nutbar scapegoat. Furthermore, you will find these same people arguing to go back to archaic paperballots for the sole purpose that its easier to commit democrat vote fraud with them.
All voting machines should have a verifiable paper trial, period.