To: salbam
2 posted on
12/19/2005 9:31:18 AM PST by
new yorker 77
(FAKE POLLS DO NOT TRANSLATE INTO REAL VOTERS!)
To: new yorker 77
Well the Times is obviously a right wing rag.
3 posted on
12/19/2005 9:34:50 AM PST by
cripplecreek
(Never a minigun handy when you need one.)
To: new yorker 77
Let us not forget that if Bush had only gotten just 51,000 more votes in a combination of border-line states, he would have gotten 304 electoral votes rather than 287.
8 posted on
12/19/2005 9:45:57 AM PST by
pabianice
(I guess)
To: new yorker 77
What about the paper trail? Is this a little slip of paper that the voter gets to show he voted, kind of like a receipt? What if it does not reflect the voter's wishes? Does he go to the poll worker and have his vote deleted so he can revote? Do we really want poll workers to be able to delete votes? If not, what good is it?
15 posted on
12/19/2005 10:45:31 AM PST by
sportutegrl
(People who say, "All I know is . . ." really mean, "All I want you to focus on is . . .")
To: new yorker 77
Lessee, the moonbats love motervoter, internet voter and every kind of voter that's easy to commit fraud with. What they don't like are reliable electronic voting machines. Let's go back to paper ballots, they say, which are the easiest of all to stuff or lose, depending on the fraud.
Same-old, same-old.
30 posted on
03/06/2006 12:22:14 PM PST by
colorado tanker
(We need more "chicken-bleep Democrats" in the Senate!)
To: new yorker 77
34 posted on
11/05/2006 1:30:03 AM PST by
tcrlaf
(VOTE DEM! You'll Look GREAT In A Burqa!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson