As long as Al Queda is defined as a "foreign power" as specified in the provisions of the Act then the administration is well within the law....
I do question whether Al Queda can meet that definition.....
So, Al Qaeda is a "domestic Power?"
It's one or the other.
I think that was one of Rice's points w/ Russert yesterday, that the laws were tailored for foreign intelligence assets and not "stateless" terrorists.
National Review's Jim Robbins says AQ does meet the law's definition of "foreign power":
http://www.nationalreview.com/robbins/robbins200512190859.asp