Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: angkor

As long as Al Queda is defined as a "foreign power" as specified in the provisions of the Act then the administration is well within the law....

I do question whether Al Queda can meet that definition.....


8 posted on 12/19/2005 4:35:43 AM PST by nevergore (“It could be that the purpose of my life is simply to serve as a warning to others.”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: nevergore

So, Al Qaeda is a "domestic Power?"

It's one or the other.


28 posted on 12/19/2005 4:59:55 AM PST by Beckwith (The liberal press has picked sides ... and they have sided with the Islamofascists)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: nevergore

I think that was one of Rice's points w/ Russert yesterday, that the laws were tailored for foreign intelligence assets and not "stateless" terrorists.


34 posted on 12/19/2005 5:02:53 AM PST by neodad (Rule Number 1: Be Armed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: nevergore

National Review's Jim Robbins says AQ does meet the law's definition of "foreign power":

http://www.nationalreview.com/robbins/robbins200512190859.asp


67 posted on 12/19/2005 6:14:07 PM PST by Yardstick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson