To: angkor
Not so fast, angkor. This section, among others, was clearly violated by the wiretapping:
(B) there is no substantial likelihood that the surveillance will acquire the contents of any communication to which a United States person is a party;
As far as we know, United States citizens were eavesdropped on if they were involved with Al Qaeda. I don't have a problem with this, but this law does not cover what the White House did.
18 posted on
12/19/2005 4:49:42 AM PST by
cwiz24
(I worked very hard on this tagline.)
To: cwiz24
See #16.
You're right that "United States person" and "substantial likelihood" are issues, but not as simple as they seem at first glance.
26 posted on
12/19/2005 4:59:00 AM PST by
angkor
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson