Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Principled

I do not deny that unless you recover your costs you will be in trouble but that is no guarantee that you will do so. Much less another 38% to cover taxes.

Investment decisions within a class of investments are not affected by income tax considerations. You buy the 6% bond rather than the 4% bond though each faces the same percent of tax. You chose a business because it was predicted to be more profitable than another not because of income tax considerations.

If you have such power to decide a price why stop at $100 why not charge $200? Obviously you have no power to do that which theory and practice confirm. This is the same argument against setting a minimum wage why set it at $6.50 and not $15? Market forces restrict both the ability to set prices and wages on a whim.


232 posted on 12/22/2005 12:08:30 PM PST by justshutupandtakeit (Public Enemy #1, the RATmedia.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 226 | View Replies ]


To: justshutupandtakeit
Investment decisions within a class of investments are not affected by income tax considerations.

Alrighty then. Whatever. That is nuts, purely nuts. You're really telling this forum that tax consequences do not affect investment decisions. Wow.

If you have such power to decide a price why stop at $100 why not charge $200?

Because I want to maximize profit. Maximum price will not bring maximum profit. If it did, we'd unbounded price increases.

235 posted on 12/22/2005 12:12:30 PM PST by Principled
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 232 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson