Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Kellis91789

I won't argue that some won't do that, but I would say that most cheating is done because of the sense that they are being treated unfairly and are trying to 'get even.' The passage of the FairTax will be an overt statement that we are trying to be fair because there aren't multiple rates and no group is singled out for special treatment.

I am opposed to any attempt to tax income even as a measure to prevent cheating, though it would probably work. We'd then need a bureacracy to account and collect that tax and that low 'compliance' rate would be subject to inflation creep upwards.


119 posted on 12/21/2005 5:49:11 PM PST by Badray (Limited constitutional government means protection for all, but favor for none.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies ]


To: Badray

"I am opposed to any attempt to tax income even as a measure to prevent cheating, though it would probably work."

Let's make a deal. That's what Congress does, right ? Here's the deal:

Eliminate SS, Medicare, and Disability as programs funded by taxes. Instead, people will have to purchase the amount of coverage (benefit) they want, just as though they were buying insurance. That eliminates cheating and the income tax, retains the programs as voluntary purchases/investments, and gets us a low FairTax rate to cover all the Genreal Fund obligations.

Don't I wish ;=)


149 posted on 12/21/2005 11:58:58 PM PST by Kellis91789 (Rome didn't build a great Empire by having meetings. It did it by killing all who opposed it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 119 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson