Oh really. So she says it and it's law?
she knows alot more about it then you do. and so does Mark Levin. the "law" is always open to interpretation - does the white house have to consult with the ACLU and the Times to get their OK on it too? do we need the ACLU and the Times to agree, does that make it "legal"?
clearly, this program was "lawyered" up at every level - DOJ, NSA, revealed to congressional committes, periodically reviewed and re-authorized, etc. the fact that some parties might disagree with the legal advice DOES NOT MAKE THE PROGRAM ILLEGAL. Its just being done for political purposes.
You know, I just read the law in question on line. It only took me about 15 minutes. If I can do this kind of work to be a better informed citizen, why can't you? How about you google USC Title 50, 1801 and do some reading before you post?