Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Excuse_My_Bellicosity
"The program has oversight from the three branches of govt."

Did this program have the oversight of the three branches of government? From what I'm reading it looks like "Congressional leaders" were briefed on the program a few times, whatever that means, but the Courts were kept entirely out of it. These were warrantless wiretaps.
46 posted on 12/17/2005 8:31:45 PM PST by TKDietz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]


To: TKDietz

From post #24:
"EAVESDROPPING INS AND OUTS [Mark R. Levin]
Some brief background: The Foreign Intelligence Security Act permits the government to monitor foreign communications, even if they are with U.S. citizens -- 50 USC 1801, et seq. A FISA warrant is only needed if the subject communications are wholly contained in the United States and involve a foreign power or an agent of a foreign power.

The reason the President probably had to sign an executive order is that the Justice Department office that processes FISA requests, the Office of Intelligence Policy and Review (OIPR), can take over 6 months to get a standard FISA request approved. It can become extremely bureaucratic, depending on who is handling the request. His executive order is not contrary to FISA if he believed, as he clearly did, that he needed to act quickly. The president has constitutional powers, too.

It's also clear from the Times piece that Rockefeller knew about the government's eavesdropping, as did the FISA court.

http://corner.nationalreview.com/05_12_11_corner-archive.asp#084896


63 posted on 12/18/2005 8:26:43 AM PST by Excuse_My_Bellicosity ("Sharpei diem - Seize the wrinkled dog.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson