Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Virginia Ridgerunner
her analysis of the case's circumstantial evidence that Sickert was the Ripper is most compelling.

Cornwell (like most Ripper enthusiasts) tends to skate inconventient facts. To fit her theosry that the Ripper was impotent, she declares Sickett was too, on the basis he had some kind of operation at the age of 5. Ignoring that the guy was married three times.

54 posted on 12/17/2005 6:32:25 PM PST by Oztrich Boy (so natural to mankind is intolerance in whatever they really care about - J S Mill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies ]


To: Oztrich Boy

Well, according to Cornwell, Sickert's early operation was to repair a fistula (literally a hole caused by a severe infection) in his privates and that the surgery was botched, rendering him "non-functional" physically even though both his normal biological impulses remained intact. Her argument therefore is Freudian in basis, but again, she has no real proof. However, Sickert apparently lived in White Chapel in 1888 and did have a morbid fascination with the Ripper in later life, even painting a picture entitled 'Jack the Ripper's bedroom.'


58 posted on 12/18/2005 8:27:38 AM PST by Virginia Ridgerunner ("Si vis pacem para bellum")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson