Nonsense. The point is that access to gun records without warrant is in the PATRIOT Act and that's why Larry Craig objected. THAT IS THE TOPIC OF THIS THREAD.
You complain about the potential dangers of this Act when nothing could be more dangerous than nuclear weapons in the hands of those potential abusers.
You've proven my point. The government does not need access to gun records without warrant to protect this country from nuclear or biological attack.
Do you propose we get rid of our nuclear weapons because we may elect a scumbag as president again?
Oh goody, a nuclear strawman. How about sticking to the topic of the thread, or is that just too difficult for you?
That is only one aspect of this holdup and the discussion of it. There are some complaining that we live in a "police state" others are complaining about warrants. One intelligent poster even listed all the provisions which the RATS are fighting over.
And there could be no bigger fool than a person believing that the RATS are holding this up (with the four Useful Idiots) because of concern about Second Amendment rights.
Hence your objection is completely unwarranted and your logic invalid. Do you think we should get rid of nuclear weapons because of the potential election of potential abusers of them?