Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Everybody gets guns but us
The Chicago Sun-Times ^ | December 16, 2005 | Al Barski and Thaddeus J. Kochanny

Posted on 12/16/2005 10:47:37 AM PST by neverdem

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-62 next last
To: KarlInOhio
Retired cops should have no higher right to carry a concealed weapon than anyone else.

Yeah, it's a well-known fact that cops suddenly forget everything they know about weapons handling, law, crime-fighting, etc. after they turn in their shields. Obviously they have no special qualifications to carry guns.

21 posted on 12/16/2005 11:48:23 AM PST by Max in Utah (By their works you shall know them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: KarlInOhio
Retired cops should have no higher right to carry a concealed weapon than anyone else.

Excellent point, and in fact the Constitution does not recognize a higher right for any citizen retired or not. Cops or anybody else have exactly the same rights under the Constitution.

22 posted on 12/16/2005 11:50:15 AM PST by Navy Patriot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ibheath
"The point is, a civilian doesn't spend every day confronting the evil side of human nature, a cop does. Those people a cop has sentup sometimes coming looking for that cop, and they don't care if that cop has retired or not.

You beat me to the punch. You articulated it much better than I could have.

To add another point... in this case a retired Chicago Police Officer has LESS rights than an normal citizen.

It's a traveshamockery!

23 posted on 12/16/2005 11:51:23 AM PST by Toadman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: calex59
***I think he is pointing out that civilians can carry concealed(if they manage to actually get a permit) but he can't. I would say that is discrimination, wouldn't you?***

No. That's not what the ex-cop is moaning about.

In IL we do not have Concealed Carry, never have (almost did but that's a long story). And in Chicago handguns are illegal to possess - period.

What he wants is a Special Privilege - SCREW HIM. When I can legally carry HE can, until then he can STFU!

24 posted on 12/16/2005 12:04:56 PM PST by Condor51 (Leftists are moral and intellectual parasites - Standing Wolf)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Toadman
***To add another point... in this case a retired Chicago Police Officer has LESS rights than an normal citizen.***

Wrong. He has the exact same rights. There is NO Concealed Carry in IL and in Chicago handguns are BANNED - for all 'citizens'.

When I can carry, he can.

Oh and since he lives in the city, he better have sold his handgun stat upon retiring (Chicago cops buy their own), otherwise he is guilty of a felony.

25 posted on 12/16/2005 12:22:34 PM PST by Condor51 (Leftists are moral and intellectual parasites - Standing Wolf)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Max in Utah
Yeah, it's a well-known fact that cops suddenly forget everything they know about weapons handling, law, crime-fighting, etc. after they turn in their shields. Obviously they have no special qualifications to carry guns.

I would bet that a fairly large percentage of cops have less formal handgun training that I have had.

26 posted on 12/16/2005 12:28:19 PM PST by RogueIsland
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: KarlInOhio

Retired cops should have no higher right to carry a concealed weapon than anyone else.

hrm.. i agree with that only on the basis that EVERYONE should have the right to conceal. retired cops however are slightly more at risk than civilians tho, as they most likely have arrested people that carry grudges.


27 posted on 12/16/2005 12:37:58 PM PST by absolootezer0 ("My God, why have you forsaken us.. no wait, its the liberals that have forsaken you... my bad")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Condor51

Well, if that is the case then tough sh** to him and other retired cops. If they support the disarming of citizens then they have brought this on themselves. Thanks for clearing that up for me.


28 posted on 12/16/2005 12:44:39 PM PST by calex59 (Seeing the light shouldn't make you blind...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: neverdem; Travis McGee; Joe Brower; Alice au Wonderland; Darksheare; Eaker; Squantos; mhking; ...
well, looks like the former cat's paw doesn't like being a mouse.

get your former brothers in blue to strike until the civilian population of Chicago may freely own and carry firearms if it bothers you so much, Former-cop/present-civilian Barski.

29 posted on 12/16/2005 1:44:29 PM PST by King Prout (many accuse me of being overly literal... this would not be a problem if many were not under-precise)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ibheath
"I believe we should go back to the days where everyone carried, "

I think you should have made that comma a period, and left it there. Everyone should carry, openly. (With concealed backups, too.) Call me a radical.
30 posted on 12/16/2005 1:47:45 PM PST by Old Student (WRM, MSgt, USAF(Ret.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Freedom_no_exceptions; adx

--Yep. Wonder how many times he personally enforced Chicago's gun laws against said peasants.

--Also gotta wonder whether, how often, and how loudly his police union lobbied against concealed-carry for the "rest of us."

Second on the both of them. Many cops say to Joe Peasant, 'why do you need to carry???', but never would go anywhere w/out their guns.


31 posted on 12/16/2005 1:58:27 PM PST by jjm2111 (99.7 FM Radio Kuwait - Whatever you do, don't say the 'C' word!"_)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Max in Utah
"Yeah, it's a well-known fact that cops suddenly forget everything they know about weapons handling, law, crime-fighting, etc. after they turn in their shields. Obviously they have no special qualifications to carry guns. "

Some cops know very little about weapons. Some cops shoot less often than some civilians. I can easily believe that the cop who only goes to the range 2-3 times a year to qual is much better than the guy who practices IDPA for fun.

32 posted on 12/16/2005 2:01:30 PM PST by jjm2111 (99.7 FM Radio Kuwait - Whatever you do, don't say the 'C' word!"_)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: KarlInOhio

I agree!

Now we'll both be flamed to death by L.E. sycophants.


33 posted on 12/16/2005 2:13:22 PM PST by Richard-SIA ("The natural progress of things is for government to gain ground and for liberty to yield" JEFFERSON)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
If public safety is the goal, all ex-cops should be required to carry concealed, if they are able to.

This looks to me like Mayor El Jefe Daly, is afraid of certain retired cops. Remember when they collected weapons and ammo from the troops when Billy Bob "the stainmeister" Klintoon spoke to the troops somewhere in some hot zone? He aggregated troops, and then disarmed them, for no logical stated reason. I figure Billy Bob was afraid of our own troops.

De Ja Vu all over again?
34 posted on 12/16/2005 2:30:05 PM PST by porkchops 4 mahound ("Si vis pacem, para bellum", If you wish peace, prepare for war.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Max in Utah
Yeah, it's a well-known fact that cops suddenly forget everything they know about weapons handling, law, crime-fighting, etc. after they turn in their shields

When it comes to weapons handling, I don't think most cops have anything over most civilian firearm owners.(and that's being generous)

35 posted on 12/16/2005 2:30:07 PM PST by paul51 (11 September 2001 - Never forget)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: jjm2111
I can easily believe that the cop who only goes to the range 2-3 times a year to qual is much better than the guy who practices IDPA for fun.

Your wife is assaulted on the street by a knife-wielding gangbanger. An armed citizen is nearby; he is either:

1) a retired cop with plenty of experience and street smarts
-or-
2) a better-than-average target shooter who never confronted a bad guy

Which would you choose?

Ideally every reponsible citizen should be able to carry at all times, if they so decide. Until then, I'd want at least a few more good guys out there (retired Chicago cops) with the means to stop the bad guys.

36 posted on 12/16/2005 2:38:58 PM PST by Max in Utah (By their works you shall know them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Max in Utah
I'd prefer to to have someone with tactical training and practice that more civilians than cops do. When it comes to experience and street smarts, private citizens are not all the neophytes you seem to suggest.
37 posted on 12/16/2005 2:46:41 PM PST by paul51 (11 September 2001 - Never forget)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: paul51

I'd prefer to have a Delta Force operator, but I'll take what I can get.


38 posted on 12/16/2005 2:50:49 PM PST by Max in Utah (By their works you shall know them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: KarlInOhio

" Retired cops should have no higher right to carry a concealed weapon than anyone else."

No higher right than a Retired Marine

Retired Shoe Salesman

Retired Nanny

Where cops get the idea that just because they are cops they get some kind of special consideration is beyond me.


39 posted on 12/16/2005 2:54:02 PM PST by Leatherneck_MT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Old Student

"I think you should have made that comma a period, and left it there. Everyone should carry, openly. (With concealed backups, too.) Call me a radical."

Radical!!

In the same cloth as

Patrick Henry
Thomas Jefferson
Samual Adams

My kind of Radical.

Semper Fi


40 posted on 12/16/2005 2:56:39 PM PST by Leatherneck_MT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-62 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson