Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: billbears

"You'd just trash the whole Constitution if a Republican hack told you to wouldn't you?"

No, I wouldn't, but if there were valid reasons for some
actions, not usually acceptable in peacetime, if it meant
the survival of our nation, I would.
The democrats are prepared to hand us to our enemies and
it's quite evident by their actions, that a return to power is more important than any other concern.

Perhaps you hadn't noticed that there is a war on?
Perhaps you would have prefered, "They should be hung, after a fair and impartial trial of their peers."?
That's ok, I'm down with that, but no sniveling and no
appeal after appeal till 20 years goes by.

Perhaps you think all this is somehow magically going away?


I'm not going for that,"It's all one party, they are all the same" nonsense, if you can't tell the difference you
have no business voting.


155 posted on 12/16/2005 2:41:42 PM PST by tet68 ( " We would not die in that man's company, that fears his fellowship to die with us...." Henry V.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies ]


To: tet68
No, I wouldn't, but if there were valid reasons for some actions, not usually acceptable in peacetime, if it meant the survival of our nation, I would.

Funny didn't see that power covered under the Constitution. But never mind, I would expect no less from Republicans, considering their history.

The democrats are prepared to hand us to our enemies and it's quite evident by their actions,

Oh yes. Preserving liberty will hand us right over to the enemy. Much better to centralize more power with the 537 hacks that call themselves our leaders

that a return to power is more important than any other concern.

And yet the same urgent desire to stay in power by the Republicans is acceptable with you. Partisanship? Never. They care, they really do

Perhaps you hadn't noticed that there is a war on?

Now are you talking about the incursion into Iraq or the continued attack on our liberties by our 'leaders'?

Perhaps you would have prefered, "They should be hung, after a fair and impartial trial of their peers."

Why of course!! Why don't you try finding a judge who will agree with you. I would suggest the most conservative Janice Rogers Brown or even Justice Clarence Thomas but they would laugh you out of their respective courts. And of course you have charges to bring up against them? Let me guess? Treason? 'Conservatives' do so overuse that word you wouldn't know what it was if it bit you in the arse.

Perhaps you think all this is somehow magically going away?

Our freedoms? Not magically at all. Step by step. With full support by the party faithful

I'm not going for that,"It's all one party, they are all the same" nonsense, if you can't tell the difference you have no business voting.

Hmmmm, let's see. Government waste? Check. Say whatever it takes to get into office? Check. Full prosecution of whatever 'war' happens to be their party's focus at the time? Check. Expansion of government and intrusion into the powers of the separate and sovereign states as they see fit? Check.

Nope you're right. There's a biiig difference < /sarc>

175 posted on 12/16/2005 5:37:12 PM PST by billbears (Deo Vindice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 155 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson