Try reading all the conflicting theories and evolving theories evolutionists continue to make. Then perhaps you can talk about I.D. Also, try reading Behe's book. I don't think the Dover Trial was a scientific lecture series but rather the usual suspects attempting to silent any scientist who might actually dare to assert irreducible complexity. How dare anyone use scientific research and facts to discredit our philosophy!
There aren't any. Howevere, there are significant disagreements on details.
Also, try reading Behe's book.
Done. But Behe has already contradicted much of that. What kind of science requires NO PHYSICAL EVIDENCE. As Behe claimed in his testimony, under oath, in the Dover trial.
I'm going to guess that you didn't follow the trial and you don't know what ID is either.