[CarolinaGuitarman]

"The point is that *evolutionists* would claim it discredits ID theory."

No, we wouldn't, and don't. There IS NO WAY to falsify ID; it's not a scientific theory. Since we ALREADY HAVE observed speciation in the lab, and evolutionists don't say that ID is refuted, your argument falls to pieces.

"Are you claiming that if macroevolution (you specify the extent of macroevolution) were observed in the lab, evolutionists would *not* claim that it invalidates ID theory? If so, you are either incredibly naive, or you are just a bald-faced liar."

And you are a very poor debater. :)

[RussP]

"And you are a very poor debater. :)"

No, but you sure seem to be. :)

[Senator Bedfellow]

No, we wouldn't, and don't.

Ah, and people are supposed to believe you about what "evolutionists" say and think merely because you happen to be one, are they?

Look, you're being told what it is you're supposed to say and believe, and it's tremendously inconsiderate of you to, you know, object, and then persist in having your own opinions. This discussion would go much more smoothly if your interlocutor were permitted to argue both sides, so just get with the program already...