Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Right Wing Professor
It's a well established term in animal behavior, nothing to do with sociobabble. It means engaging in behavior that is immediately neutral or harmful in exchange for reciprocal behavior that is beneficial.

No, it's not well established, it is controversial. And easy to see why, the contradiction in terms must be unpalatable for all but the most devoted reductionists.

Kin selection is much better established which is what you are referring to below but I'd be happy to discuss that with you as well.

You think a killdeer that puts her life in danger to draw predators away from her chicks does so because she was raised Catholic?

Certainly not but when the killdeer jumps in the ice to save another killdeers chicks, you can get back to me because then I will suspect the killdeer did have some training by Catholic parents.

1,026 posted on 12/14/2005 3:25:45 PM PST by jwalsh07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1025 | View Replies ]


To: jwalsh07
No, it's not well established, it is controversial. And easy to see why, the contradiction in terms must be unpalatable for all but the most devoted reductionists.~

Do we rely on your authority as an animal behaviorist, here, or do you have some actual evidence?

Cleaner fish engage in reciprocal altruism. So do vampire bats, chimpanzees, etc. These are all well-established examples that don't involve kin. All you have against are your own peculiar prejudices

1,031 posted on 12/14/2005 6:35:37 PM PST by Right Wing Professor (...just call me Pangloss)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1026 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson