To: DustyMoment
cuts -- from $27 an hour to between $10 and $12.50 -- are unfair Is cutting from $27 to $0 more fair?
8 posted on
12/11/2005 11:24:27 AM PST by
Brilliant
To: Brilliant
Either way, you lose you house - what's the difference?
14 posted on
12/11/2005 11:29:04 AM PST by
patton
("Hard Drive Cemetary" - forthcoming best seller)
To: Brilliant
cuts -- from $27 an hour to between $10 and $12.50 -- are unfairIs cutting from $27 to $0 more fair?
Dunno...but a cut from $27 to $10, now THAT's a cut.
17 posted on
12/11/2005 11:30:55 AM PST by
evad
To: Brilliant
They will make $10 to $12 on unemployment. And they can find jobs paying that in a fewmonths. They have nothing to lose.
27 posted on
12/11/2005 11:43:49 AM PST by
TXBSAFH
("I would rather be a free man in my grave then living as a puppet or a slave." - Jimmy Cliff)
To: Brilliant
That line of reasoning helped Teddy K. beat Mitt Romney a couple of elections ago.
Romney was a "merchant banker" that was in the process of consolidating two label makers, iirc.
Ted got his boys to bring out Ohio workers to harass Romney.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson