No, you quoted me out of context, claimed I meant something other than what I clearly meant, and attributed an additional statement to me which I never made. And since your second lie "proves" that your first lie was the truth, it all balances out, right? That's not quite as ingenious as "I never had sex with that woman," but with some more practice, you'll get there.
Now, since you've made it plain that you have no point other than to irritate Freepers who believe the investigation should come before the final report, I'm done with you. Please refrain from subjecting me to any more of your childhood antics.
Actually, this is really very amusing. I do, in fact, enjoy watching you scramble about searching for some rhetorical angle that provides you with 'plausible deniability,' like Elizabeth Taylor looking for a camera angle that won't make her look old and fat.
The simple fact is *you* are the one that drew that parallel between 9/11 and the current disaster, not me.
As much as I know you'd like to be able to take it back, consider the last clause of the first sentence I put in boldface, as well as the ensuing sentences.
I've no doubt your cognitive dissonance has started to kick in, so you will get a sort of 'swimmy' view of what you wrote as your mind tries to make it say what you want it to while your eyes just won't go along with the program. Don't worry though. The rest of us aren't as invested in what you wrote, and will be able to read what you said quite clearly ;o)