Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Witnesses heard no talk of bomb
Orlando Sentinel ^ | December 9 | Mark Schlueb Sentinel Staff Writer

Posted on 12/09/2005 12:28:29 PM PST by MRMEAN

..., it became increasingly apparent that the Maitland man killed by federal air marshals may have been fleeing in panic as he suffered the symptoms of bipolar disorder.

--SNIP--

A Miami-Dade police spokeswoman said Thursday that multiple witnesses reported that the 44-year-old was yelling that he had a bomb as he made his way down the aisle with a backpack slung across his chest. Later, the agency's chief of investigations insisted that Alpizar was yelling about a bomb but declined to say whether he was on the plane at the time.

Seven passengers interviewed by the Orlando Sentinel -- seated in both the front and rear of the main passenger cabin -- said Alpizar was silent as he ran past them on his way to the exit. One thought he had taken the wrong flight. Another thought he was going to throw up.

"I can tell you, he never said a thing in that airplane. He never called out he had a bomb," said Orlando architect Jorge A. Borrelli, who helped comfort Alpizar's wife after the gunfire. "He never said a word from the point he passed me at Row 9. . . . He did not say a word to anybody."

Two teens seated in Row 26 agreed. So did Jorge Figueroa, a power-plant operator from Lakeland seated a few rows behind first class.

"He wasn't saying anything; he was just running," Figueroa said. "I said to myself, 'It is probably a person who took the wrong plane.' "

What Alpizar's fellow passengers did hear were the desperate explanations from Buechner, Alpizar's wife, who at first seemed embarrassed by her husband's hasty exit. She started to follow him off the plane, saying, "He's sick. He needs to get off the plane," witnesses said.

(Excerpt) Read more at orlandosentinel.com ...


TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events; US: Florida; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: airmarshal; alpizar; flight924
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-162 next last
To: oolatec
Uh, maybe he said he had a bomb when he was OFF the plane...

Every report from the very beginning has consistently reported that. The Monday morning quarterbacks, usually as dumb as bricks, can now come up with a gazillion scenarios where the nutcase was right and the Air Marshalls wrong. Screw 'em.

If the nutjob was off his meds, and if his wifes cared that much for him, she would not have allowed him to travel unmedicated!

D'OH!

41 posted on 12/09/2005 1:13:13 PM PST by Publius6961 (The IQ of California voters is about 420........... .............cumulatively)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: MRMEAN
Let's disband the War on Terror, Impeach Bush, Let Saddam go and appoint Al Gore president for life.

Alpizar was not a threat to the passengers when he was shot

He was a threat to the Sky Marshals and to others based on the power of any bomb he might have. I don't think the passengers would like being roasted alive any more than being blown up.

42 posted on 12/09/2005 1:13:14 PM PST by Mike Darancette (Mesocons for Rice '08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TCats

I'm with you man. And this was driven home when I saw the luggage being conveniently destroyed on the tarmac...


43 posted on 12/09/2005 1:13:39 PM PST by Paisan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Cboldt

We're gonna have to disagree on this one.

Any aircraft that has made a single stop on foreign soil needs to have its occupants screened/observed more closely.

Bottom line is that the media has latched onto the guy's instability as a reason for calling the shooting unjustified, when in reality that has no bearing on the Marshal's split-second decision to shoot in an attempt to thwart a perceived threat.


44 posted on 12/09/2005 1:16:31 PM PST by jra
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: oolatec

Since that is where the action took place, that is probably where those words were said. The passengers would not have heard that. When a police officer says stop, stop.


45 posted on 12/09/2005 1:17:03 PM PST by RightWhale (Not transferable -- Good only for this trip)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

Stop or I'll shoot.

I guess he should have stopped.
46 posted on 12/09/2005 1:17:14 PM PST by evets (God bless president Bush!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MRMEAN
his wife had already explained to the marshals that he was sick,

Should this work there will be Muslim women accompanying hijackers and bombers to put air marshals off.

47 posted on 12/09/2005 1:17:22 PM PST by Mike Darancette (Mesocons for Rice '08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MRMEAN

I agree with you.
I've read where people say he should get a medal.

Huh?
Since when do we give medals to law enforcement when they shoot a mentally disturbed man?
I don't know if the shooting was justified but in the end, the dead guy didn't deserve death.


48 posted on 12/09/2005 1:18:20 PM PST by JRochelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Narcoleptic
the only thing that is still unsafe is the risk of a lockerbie style bomb in the luggage that sneaks onto a flight

That is the achilles heal and why his disembarking the plane is dangerous sign regardless of what he said. Planes that have had luggage placed on them when passengers have left has caused flights to be stopped while the baggage has been rechecked.

49 posted on 12/09/2005 1:18:32 PM PST by Raycpa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: brytlea

Well, there were no apparent connections. Theoretically, the screaming man could have been a distraction to get the Marshals off the plane so that any one of the other passengers could detonate a device. So should they have dragged everyone out? The one guy posed a threat so the one guy should have had a gun to his head.


50 posted on 12/09/2005 1:20:04 PM PST by RambozoDClown
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: MRMEAN

My question is - Why would his wife make him get on the plane, when she knew his medical condition and that he hadn't had his meds?


51 posted on 12/09/2005 1:20:30 PM PST by airborne (Al-Queda can recruit on college campuses but the US military can't!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: oolatec
I was reading, or maybe heard... or whatever.. but that when he snapped he thought there was a bomb on the plane, panicked and headed for the hills. so IF he muttered bomb, it was possible that it was in the context he thought that there was one on the plane..
However I will agree, that Hindsight, does not save lives. the Marshals had to do what they felt was right to protect the passengers (or people in the terminal at the other end of the jetway). Seconds of immediate action does not give way to analysis, and sniper quality targeting.
I also have to agree with a person in another post, that said the terrorists wouldn't hesitate to perform the same type of act, if they thought they would get away with it.
52 posted on 12/09/2005 1:20:47 PM PST by skyhntr (You've never been lost until you've been lost at Mach 3. (Paul F. Crickmore - test pilot).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Homer1
Investigators say that two undercover air marshals followed Alpizar off the plane and ordered him to surrender.

Followed him off the aircraft? What if this was a actual terrorist operation with multiple suspects, some of which could have still been on board when the Marshal's left the aircraft. After all, it would not be the first time multiple terrorist were on board on of our aircraft.

The marshals say Alpizar yelled that he had a bomb and would use it. He walked toward them, they backed up, he started to put his hands in his backpack, and they fired. Alpizar was hit by multiple shots fired by both officers.

Why didn't they shoot him when he yelled out he had a bomb? They waited while he walked towards them? They backed up? Seems to me they would have shot him as soon as the word "bomb" was yelled out. There were also reports that stated they told him to put his pack down. How would one put their pack down, without reaching for it first?

53 posted on 12/09/2005 1:21:30 PM PST by Jigsaw John
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: JRochelle
Since when do we give medals to law enforcement when they shoot a mentally disturbed man?

Since logic is not your strong suit let's review.

You know now that the nutcase was a mentally disturbed man. Mohammad Atta was a mentally disturbed man.

At the time the air marshalls shot and killed an imminent threat, neither they not anyone other than his wife knew for a fact that he mas mentally ill.

See the difference?

54 posted on 12/09/2005 1:23:28 PM PST by Publius6961 (The IQ of California voters is about 420........... .............cumulatively)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: jra
Any aircraft that has made a single stop on foreign soil needs to have its occupants screened/observed more closely.

They are. 100% must depart the aircraft, then pass through immigrations and customs. From that point, they are placed on the street side of the airport. If they have a connecting flight, they have to pass through security at that airport.

I don't know what the protocol is for screening aircraft that comes in from foreign countries; but the people are all required to exit.

And this guy did not arrive in the USA on that plane. He arrived on a flight from Equador.

Bottom line is that the media has latched onto the guy's instability as a reason for calling the shooting unjustified, when in reality that has no bearing on the Marshal's split-second decision to shoot in an attempt to thwart a perceived threat.

Instability is a factor in favor of shooting, not against it. Agitated people are more likely to perpetrate violence. I think the guy's agitated state reinforced the decision to shoot, accompanied by not following orders, and according to the official report, expressing a verbal threat that could be taken as a threat to detonate a bomb.

55 posted on 12/09/2005 1:23:32 PM PST by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: MRMEAN; All

Hindsight is 20/20. In the eyes of the air marshal, and in the time given, this man was ARMED with a bomb.

Perhaps you are unaware of the modus operandi of a suicide bomber: Suicide bombers attract attention in order to take out as many people as possible when they detonate their bomb. Anyone attempting arrest or search gets taken out with the bomb.

Hey, why don't you sign up for air marshall training and volunteer for the suicide-bomber search squad? You won't because no one in their right mind would get within 20 feet of a suicide bomber or a potential suicide bomber.


56 posted on 12/09/2005 1:23:48 PM PST by TaxRelief (Thank a soldier, today!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: oolatec

uh MAYBE?


57 posted on 12/09/2005 1:25:31 PM PST by takenoprisoner (dead men don't talk)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: RambozoDClown

Well, we disagree. That's fine with me.
susie


58 posted on 12/09/2005 1:26:04 PM PST by brytlea (I'm not a conspiracy theorist....really.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

Comment #59 Removed by Moderator

To: TaxRelief
Suicide bombers attract attention in order to take out as many people as possible when they detonate their bomb.

Why would they want to attract attention to themselves prior to executing their mission? Why not just walk quietly into a crowded area and execute?

60 posted on 12/09/2005 1:29:37 PM PST by Jigsaw John
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-162 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson