I agree. It's not a scientific study. It's not double blind. It's not peer reviewed. The doctor correctly refuses to say that it's scientifically proven, because he'd get blasted if he did. The writer is properly cautious as well.
Nevertheless, those are very large numbers. If it was zero out of a hundred, I could believe it was a statistical fluke. But zero out of 30,000 is pretty incredible. I think this is enough initial evidence to call for a more rigorous follow-up investigation.
I almost think that zero out of 30,000 is unbelievable. Something just doesn't sit right with me with those numbers. You'd think that statistically speaking, there would be SOME number of cases of autism but NONE? That doesn't sound right.
I agree. The doctor's got to be exaggerating though. Is he really saying that none of the 30K children ever had any vaccines? Aren't vaccines federally required for admission into schools unless they get a religious exemption? (It doesn't sound that the people get religious exemption in that article)