Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Seamoth

I agree. It's not a scientific study. It's not double blind. It's not peer reviewed. The doctor correctly refuses to say that it's scientifically proven, because he'd get blasted if he did. The writer is properly cautious as well.

Nevertheless, those are very large numbers. If it was zero out of a hundred, I could believe it was a statistical fluke. But zero out of 30,000 is pretty incredible. I think this is enough initial evidence to call for a more rigorous follow-up investigation.


66 posted on 12/08/2005 8:12:52 PM PST by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies ]


To: Cicero

I almost think that zero out of 30,000 is unbelievable. Something just doesn't sit right with me with those numbers. You'd think that statistically speaking, there would be SOME number of cases of autism but NONE? That doesn't sound right.


73 posted on 12/08/2005 8:30:14 PM PST by metmom (Welfare was never meant to be a career choice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies ]

To: Cicero

I agree. The doctor's got to be exaggerating though. Is he really saying that none of the 30K children ever had any vaccines? Aren't vaccines federally required for admission into schools unless they get a religious exemption? (It doesn't sound that the people get religious exemption in that article)


79 posted on 12/09/2005 5:45:58 AM PST by Seamoth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson