Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Jedidah
My thoughts exactly. This couldn't have happened at O'Hare and couldn't happen at DFW, but it will if Wright is repealed.

I saw last week where Dallas Mayor, Laura Miller, just happened to realize that Love was losing money - some 5.5 million I think the article said. She wants to raise landing fees at Love. Apparently, SW pays something like .34 per 1,000 lbs to Love whereas DFW fees are around $1.40. If those landing fees are raised to something close to the fees at DFW, there's not much incentive for Southwest to have Wright repealed.
275 posted on 12/08/2005 9:17:05 PM PST by Warriormom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 261 | View Replies ]


To: Warriormom
If those landing fees are raised to something close to the fees at DFW, there's not much incentive for Southwest to have Wright repealed.

Sure there is. Time. At its small airports, Southwest can have a plane touchdown, taxi, park, unload, reload, taxi, and take off quickly. Indeed, Chicago-Columbus-BWI is less than an hour longer than Chicago-BWI. Big airports wouldn't work with a business model that requires rapid flight turnaround.

284 posted on 12/08/2005 9:37:56 PM PST by supercat (Sony delinda est.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 275 | View Replies ]

To: Warriormom; Jedidah

Well, wasn't it an L1011 that came in low and decapitated someone on 114 at the north end of the airport before it hit one of the fuel tanks on the NW end?

329 posted on 12/09/2005 8:00:17 AM PST by sam_paine (X .................................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 275 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson