To: Jedidah
My thoughts exactly. This couldn't have happened at O'Hare and couldn't happen at DFW, but it will if Wright is repealed.
I saw last week where Dallas Mayor, Laura Miller, just happened to realize that Love was losing money - some 5.5 million I think the article said. She wants to raise landing fees at Love. Apparently, SW pays something like .34 per 1,000 lbs to Love whereas DFW fees are around $1.40. If those landing fees are raised to something close to the fees at DFW, there's not much incentive for Southwest to have Wright repealed.
To: Warriormom
If those landing fees are raised to something close to the fees at DFW, there's not much incentive for Southwest to have Wright repealed. Sure there is. Time. At its small airports, Southwest can have a plane touchdown, taxi, park, unload, reload, taxi, and take off quickly. Indeed, Chicago-Columbus-BWI is less than an hour longer than Chicago-BWI. Big airports wouldn't work with a business model that requires rapid flight turnaround.
284 posted on
12/08/2005 9:37:56 PM PST by
supercat
(Sony delinda est.)
To: Warriormom; Jedidah
Well, wasn't it an L1011 that came in low and decapitated someone on 114 at the north end of the airport before it hit one of the fuel tanks on the NW end?
329 posted on
12/09/2005 8:00:17 AM PST by
sam_paine
(X .................................)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson