How dense are you. The feds have reported that there was no bomb on the plane. How could he have tried to detonate a bomb that didn't exist?
Seriously, I'm starting to worry about some of you guys.
Are you suggesting there must actually BE a bomb to justify deadly force? Information that would lead a reasonable person to believe (in hindsight, erroneously) there was bomb would never be sufficient to justify deadly force? Do you really require godlike, omniscient insight and perception?
"How dense are you. The feds have reported that there was no bomb on the plane. How could he have tried to detonate a bomb that didn't exist?"
And how would they not know this until after the fact?
Are you a DU troll or just dense?