Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Publius6961

I agree. It is the "Powell Doctrine", which I am in favor of with modification. Instead of overwhelming force as the mainstay I believe the force should be a crushing, obliterating, no barriers hell storm of fire and destruction. No distinction should be made between civilian and military structures. This type of response will infuriate the world, to be sure, but it would also serve to make the savages tread very lightly in our presence, knowing that even as much as a single and relatively inconsequential act of terror would bring the very heavens down upon them.


48 posted on 12/07/2005 10:58:25 AM PST by Eagles Talon IV
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]


To: Eagles Talon IV
This type of response will infuriate the world, to be sure, but it would also serve to make the savages tread very lightly ...

The world seems able to be infuriated with our without cause. Hardly a reason to allow that to determine how many lives we sacrifice against a truly evil enemy. I prefer the ancient simplistic approach. As many of them and as few of ours.

51 posted on 12/08/2005 8:37:45 AM PST by Publius6961 (The IQ of California voters is about 420........... .............cumulatively)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson