LOL, It does not have the long history of, let's be honest, the appearance of science as evolutionary theory might enjoy in academics. Yet, I believe it brings scientific research that conflicts with some basic foundations of Darwin . I can state that atheistic evolution is NOT a science but a philosophy that manipulates scientific data and changes as new scientific research exposes the lies. I believe if just the hstory of atheistic philosophy was objectively examined in the classroom, students could draw their own conclusions. My bet? An even higher percentage of our population would reject it .
And I can equally "state" that atheistic atomic theory is "NOT a science but a philosophy that manipulates scientific data and changes as new scientific research exposes the lies". Great.