[Aquinasfan]

And therefore his statements regarding to biological science are false?

Not necessarily, but with a high degree of probability, mainly because evolutionary theory is more philosophy than biological science, and immoral people make very poor philosophers. There is a tremendous amount of empirical data supporting this theory...

[Dimensio]

Not necessarily, but with a high degree of probability, mainly because evolutionary theory is more philosophy than biological science,

Ah, okay. Your argument is based upon a false premise then.

[Rudder]

...evolutionary theory is more philosophy than biological science

Nah, not true. Apparently you do not have a grasp of evolution.

[aNYCguy]

immoral people make very poor philosophers. There is a tremendous amount of empirical data supporting this theory...

I didn't realize Kant and Hume have been widely considered to be "very poor philosophers." At any rate, I remain skeptical of any "theory" whose body of empirical evidence is entirely comprised of your sexual judgements of dead philosophers.

[aNYCguy]

immoral people make very poor philosophers. There is a tremendous amount of empirical data supporting this theory...

I didn't realize Kant and Hume have been widely considered to be "very poor philosophers." At any rate, I remain skeptical of any "theory" whose body of empirical evidence is entirely comprised of your sexual judgements of dead philosophers.