Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: snarks_when_bored

Not really. It could be more. We could be the only one.

I was just making a sarcastic remark about how scientists pluck numbers from the air and then try to back them up. Estimates from the "Population Bomb," which was considered fairly accurate science when it was written, come to mind.


38 posted on 12/07/2005 8:46:46 AM PST by Ghost of Philip Marlowe (Liberals are blind. They are the dupes of Leftists who know exactly what they're doing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]


To: Ghost of Philip Marlowe
I was just making a sarcastic remark about how scientists pluck numbers from the air and then try to back them up.

Well, that number wasn't picked entirely at random, as I recall. It's related to the number of possible values of parameters in certain string theory scenarios, with the idea that each choice of parameters might correspond to a possible universe (the vast majority of which would be unable to support life as we know it, of course). Still, it's highly speculative, which I why I used the expression 'bandied about'.

44 posted on 12/07/2005 8:59:51 AM PST by snarks_when_bored
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson