Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: mdmathis6
Views of evolution not withstanding, I think where man is concerned, the processes that developed him have been tinkered with...take that how you will!

But nobody is arguing against such beliefs (much). Only that they aren't based on science and shouldn't be taught in a science class.

220 posted on 12/03/2005 4:11:35 PM PST by balrog666 (A myth by any other name is still inane.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 217 | View Replies ]


To: balrog666

Do you think Arthur C. Clark's 2001 a space Odyssey is a worthy subject to be discussed in a science class? The idea that a monolith acting in a Deus Ex Machina fashion acted on a select group of proto human species? Some ID types argue for ET intervention and or seeding of life on the planet, though I doubt Clarke would have had anything to do with them.

Or is 2001 more a discussion for philosophy class? Let's say 2001 is a good subject for discussion in science class...then what is so different about 2001 as opposed to a little discussion of the possible divine guidance where the origin of species is concerned?


223 posted on 12/03/2005 4:24:31 PM PST by mdmathis6 (Proof against evolution:"Man is the only creature that blushes, or needs to" M.Twain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 220 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson