[jwalsh07]

Depends upon your definition of "creationism." If it's God as fundamental creator, prime cause, first cause, originator, etc., then you're right.

I'm right because the word creation has a specific meaning which you have described accurately.

What's more, abusing the word does science no favors. Most folk don't understand the nuance when technophiles use the newspeak version. The net result is the wedge goes ever deeper and since "creationists' far outnumber technophiles blowback is inevitable.

[atlaw]

What's more, abusing the word does science no favors. Most folk don't understand the nuance when technophiles use the newspeak version. The net result is the wedge goes ever deeper and since "creationists' far outnumber technophiles blowback is inevitable.

A point well worth considering.