Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: gridlock

"The statutory authority only extends to the limits of their property, so it cannot effect you in your home."
Yet.....

What essential liberty will you give up in order to obtain a little temporary safety?


365 posted on 12/01/2005 5:46:44 PM PST by Socraticus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 364 | View Replies ]


To: Socraticus; Beelzebubba; Badray; JTN

I gotta get rolling, so I am just going to answer these repetetive arguments all at once.

#365 - Irrelevant to the question at hand. It is not a matter of whether this policy is good or not. It is a matter of whether this policy is legal or not.

#366 - Irrelevant to the question at hand. The motivation of the guards is not the issue here.

#369 - Irrelevant to the question at hand. The government is stupid and inefficient. This is news you?

#370 - Irrelevant and stupid. Comparing the security personnel in this case to the NAZIs is obscene and spits on the graves of the millions killed by that murderous regime.

#371 - Interesting, but ultimately irrelevant. This case will be tested in court, and the Fedgov will win. They have wide latitude in these areas, and no court is going to take it away.

#373 - Ditto to #371.





380 posted on 12/02/2005 2:53:24 AM PST by gridlock (eliminate perverse incentives)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 365 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson