Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: MineralMan
Good lord, no. The potential for fraud in that "voter takes a printout home" is 100%. Imagine a whole bunch of people showing up with slips of paper "proving" the count was off? There will be no chain of custody and therefore the slips cannot be collected to do a recount but an operator sure could trash an election. Don't think the receipts can be counterfeited? Remember that most election fraud involves the workers in the election office. No, optical scan should be the only method allowed as the uniform auditable voting system for all.
15 posted on 11/29/2005 12:58:52 PM PST by NonValueAdded (The honorable Richard Cheney, X man!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]


To: NonValueAdded

"Good lord, no. The potential for fraud in that "voter takes a printout home" is 100%."

Oh, I didn't mean that those would be used in tabulations, ever. I just would like a copy of what the machine recorded as my vote. Some other secure form of hard copy would be needed for recounts, for sure.


19 posted on 11/29/2005 1:05:08 PM PST by MineralMan (godless atheist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson