[HitmanLV]

See my post 70.

I think Savage does have clarity in one respect: he sees 2005 clearly as a year Bush squandered, and correctly characterizes him as lost, aloof, and out of touch.

Only the most myopic Freepers, and the listeners of the likes of Rush & Hannity, can't recognize that clear reality.

[SuzyQue]

I agree. Bush squandered 2005. I don't have an explanation for it. I'm hoping that today's speech and the speeches of the last few weeks signal that he's coming out of his fugue and will start being the President.

[Arizona Carolyn]

Oh, I recognize that without even a Michael Savage to tell me it's so. I appreciate his knowledge of history and I agree with his berating both sides over the border situation, I cannot take his back patting and the name-calling (Hush Limbaugh, Sean Vanity, Bill O'Reilly).... if for no other reason than it's totally unbecoming to do so... and I don't like the way he puts down most of his callers...

But, like I said, when he's coherent he makes a lot of points worth listening to, particularly his lessons on medieval history. Since most schools choose not to teach anything beyond the 20th century I think we need someone who takes the time to give some history lessons, just wish he'd take his meds more often.