Skip to comments.
Prof Ventures Into New Dimension [Lisa Randall alert!]
Boston Herald.com ^
| 28 November 2005
| Paul Restuccia
Posted on 11/28/2005 11:58:35 AM PST by PatrickHenry
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-69 next last
To: PatrickHenry
"She entered a branch of science where 90 percent of the professors are male, and has emerged as one of the worlds leading particle physics thinkers.
It hasnt gone unnoticed that Randall continues to achieve at a time when Harvard President Larry Summers has been under fire for remarks he made earlier this year suggesting that innate differences in ability between men and women in math and science may help explain the lack of top-level females in the profession."
Larry Summers was the prophet who could not go back to his own hometown. Aside from Lisa Randall's obvious brilliance, that in and of itself does not invalidate Summers' assertions.
I don't think that the AVERAGE male is smarter than the AVERAGE female is: I am convinced that the average for both is probably identical. Where I think the difference lies is in the distribution of intelligence in the sexes.
That is, there are more learning disabled boys in special ed than there are girls. Just as I think that there are more genius-quality males than females. So I think the two sexes are equal on the average, but different "on the two ends of the bell curve".
21
posted on
11/28/2005 12:48:02 PM PST
by
fishtank
To: PatrickHenry
For a change, I am way ahead of you guys on this one. I've actually read Warped Passages. Wonderful book. For me it was a page flipper. I read the last 200 pages in two days.
This is one smart gal.
Highly recommended reading. A technical background is a plus but not really necessary.
To: InterceptPoint
Click on the pic:
23
posted on
11/28/2005 12:58:28 PM PST
by
PatrickHenry
(Expect no response if you're a troll, lunatic, dotard, or incurable ignoramus.)
To: Dark Skies
"The extra-dimension thing has really piqued peoples interest, says Randall. What makes me different as a scientist is that Im kind of imaginative. The ideas just happen.
- You know, this whole idea of gravity spilling over from a fifth, flat dimension got me thinking. My own theory is that most of the gravity in the universe is locked up in black holes and we only get to experience the little bit that "leaks" out and which collects around stars and planets in much the same way as iron filings collect around magnetic poles.
I don't know where these ideas of mine come from, they just happen.
To: PatrickHenry
I wonder what a guy would talk about while out on a first date........If it was me, I would probably start out with something witty like "Whats your sign?"
25
posted on
11/28/2005 12:59:27 PM PST
by
Hot Tabasco
(It must suck being an Islamofascist....... they don't get Christmas presents.....)
To: PatrickHenry
Click on the pic:I've done that. Lots of stars on these reviews.
To: PatrickHenry
He [Harvard President, Larry Summers] made a generalization based on inadequate knowledge of the literature on the subject. She is mischaracterizing his statement. He said we should remain open to the possibility that the differences in achievement in the physical sciences and mathematics between men and women may be due to genetic factors. Most of the firestorm following his remarks was generated by people whose minds are firmly closed to evidence.
It would be difficult to explain the disparity in representation among the sexes in top flight chess players to anything but genetics. Regardless of whether producing top flight chess players is a good thing, or indicative of desirable traits in the real world, the disparity is real.
27
posted on
11/28/2005 1:09:15 PM PST
by
Lonesome in Massachussets
(NY Times headline: Protocols of the Learned Elders of CBS, Fake but Accurate, Experts Say)
To: OSHA
"I have several theories about gravity I'd like to test with her!"Pardon me but, if you're old enough for gravity to be a factor, you might be too old : )
28
posted on
11/28/2005 2:14:31 PM PST
by
muir_redwoods
(Free Sirhan Sirhan, after all, the bastard who killed Mary Jo Kopechne is walking around free)
To: Hot Tabasco
My guess is that that would be your last date.
29
posted on
11/28/2005 3:22:12 PM PST
by
furball4paws
(One of the last Evil Geniuses, or the first of their return.)
To: Lonesome in Massachussets
There are some pretty heavy duty female chess players now. My guess is that it is genetics, but not because of raw brain power. It's hard to get women interested in a highly computational game of psychological and mental warfare.
30
posted on
11/28/2005 3:25:41 PM PST
by
furball4paws
(One of the last Evil Geniuses, or the first of their return.)
To: Dark Skies
My primary reason for writing the book was to help the public better understand the complex science of particle physics I feel better knowing there are great humanitarians like this around. Most people I know have a real hunger for a better understanding the complex world of particle physics. Ya, she pretty easy on the eyes too
31
posted on
11/28/2005 3:32:11 PM PST
by
MilspecRob
(Most people don't act stupid, they really are.)
Lisa ... I'm still waiting for your freepmail ...
32
posted on
11/28/2005 4:53:47 PM PST
by
PatrickHenry
(Expect no response if you're a troll, lunatic, dotard, or incurable ignoramus.)
To: PatrickHenry
It is forbidden by the Grand 6502.
33
posted on
11/28/2005 6:48:14 PM PST
by
furball4paws
(One of the last Evil Geniuses, or the first of their return.)
To: furball4paws
All the more reason to hope.
34
posted on
11/28/2005 7:02:48 PM PST
by
PatrickHenry
(Expect no response if you're a troll, lunatic, dotard, or incurable ignoramus.)
To: fishtank
My understanding is that males and females average the same in highly G loaded tests, but female scores cluster closer to the mean, while males account for most of the extremes at both ends of the bell curve. It makes sense, nature can afford to "roll the dice" with expendable males. There are more reproductive resources vested in females so you don't take as many chances. That's why war has never been an effective population control, kill half the males and those left work overtime to "meet production quotas." Surviving low ranking males move up when reproductive resources previously unavailable to them become available. (war widows) If it is a total defeat, the winners carry off the females and put them to work implementing the genes of the winning population. Larry Summers is a ex-Clinton rump-swab who stuck his foot in his mouth, it couldn't happen to a nicer guy! You don't say stuff like that at Harvard if you want to keep your job, even if it is true. Did you notice how quickly he folded? What did he give them, more money for the women's center?
35
posted on
11/28/2005 8:29:56 PM PST
by
rootkidslim
(... got the Sony rootkit on your Wintel box? You can thank Sen. Hatch!)
To: PatrickHenry
An article with a bit more explanation of her theory: Where did all the gravity go? Good article, once again.
Not too many cranks musing on this thread, unfortunately. That always makes things so much more entertaining.
36
posted on
11/29/2005 8:41:51 AM PST
by
Quark2005
(Science aims to elucidate. Pseudoscience aims to obfuscate.)
To: Quark2005
Not too many cranks musing on this thread, unfortunately. We usually attract a few who are ready to "prove" that Einstein was a fool. (The expression "Einstein was wrong" gets over 15,000 hits on Google.) Yet they seem strangely unwilling to mix it up with Lisa Randall. But some of us are willing -- even eager -- to tangle with her.
37
posted on
11/29/2005 9:03:38 AM PST
by
PatrickHenry
(Expect no response if you're a troll, lunatic, dotard, or incurable ignoramus.)
To: PatrickHenry
The word you're looking for is: pussgrapple.
38
posted on
11/29/2005 9:56:14 AM PST
by
furball4paws
(One of the last Evil Geniuses, or the first of their return.)
To: Quark2005; Physicist; RadioAstronomer
Here are some questions which I hope you don't me asking you fellas: 1.Exactly what sort of new particles are predicted by the Randal-Sundrum theory, and are any of them predicted by any other competing theory? 2.Outside of the accelerators, what sort of astronomical observations could also be used to validate the theory? 3.Now it's heartbreaking for me to even suppose this (it's such a beautiful and elegant theory), but suppose that it turns out that Randall-Sundrum theory is not correct. A null result may not necessarily disprove it, but what sort of result may do so, or at least force us to be more skeptical?
To: PatrickHenry
A correction. That's Jerome Friedman, not Gerome, and he and his team (Richard Taylor and the late Henry Way Kendall) didn't exactly "discover" quarks, but it was their studies of electron scattering within the nucleus which lent credence to the quark model.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-69 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson