I have no problem disagreeing with the way the Federal government danced around the Constituion to create drug laws, but I also have no problem banning hard drugs.
In a perfect world without statism - my freedoms are still limited (I can't murder my boss) and I can't force others to do my bidding and visa versa.
The individual's freedom is sacrificed by the drug user when he drives a car or requires public funds for survival or treatment.
I can therefore justify drug laws by putting them into the crime category - in other words.....if you use drugs - OK - but if you step on the toes of others - it's a crime. How's that for a compromise?
"A social system is a code of laws which men observe in order to live together. Such a code must have a basic principle, a starting point, or it cannot be devised. The starting point is the question: Is the power of society limited or unlimited?"Individualism answers: The power of society is limited by the inalienable, individual rights of man. Society may make only such laws as do not violate these rights.
"Collectivism answers: The power of society is unlimited. Society may make any laws it wishes, and force them upon anyone in any manner it wishes."
-- Ayn Rand, Textbook of Americanism"
You might not have had time to read the whole thread yet, but I posted this link earlier - DUI Marijuana: Does Marijuana Impair Driving? Also, very few drug users are ever going to require any public money for survival or treatment. It happens, but it's relatively rare.
I can therefore justify drug laws by putting them into the crime category - in other words.....if you use drugs - OK - but if you step on the toes of others - it's a crime. How's that for a compromise?
You've pretty much staked out the libertarian position here. Or I should say, the libertarian position is that drug use cannot be used as a defense.
I support punishing DUI.
or requires public funds for survival or treatment.
It's government ... not the drug, alcohol, or cheeseburger abuser ... who steals "public" funds from their rightful owners.